12 January 2021
Cyberlegalities
How are online platforms that are used by billions of users around the world regulated? This panel looks at how platform economies such as Facebook or AirBnB are regulated and how they relate with and connect the different legalities they come into contact with. Does this challenge traditional understandings of law? Continue reading >>
0 
15 March 2015
The Autonomy Paradox
Daniel Halberstam’s “constitutional defense” of Opinion 2/13 is certainly thought-provoking, but it ultimately fails to convince. By taking on the seemingly impossible task of defending the indefensible, Daniel allows us to see more clearly what’s really wrong with the Court’s view. However, he mischaracterizes the Court’s many critics by alleging that “they rushed to embrace Strasbourg while forgetting about the constitutional dimension of EU governance along the way”. Criticism of Opinion 2/13 is grounded in more than amnesia about the distinctive character of EU constitutionalism. Rather, the true problem is precisely the Court’s interpretation of the EU’s constitutional order: it ignores the fact that accession is a constitutional requirement and engages in cherry-picking when it comes to the relationship between EU law and international law. To move accession forward, we need to unpack what I call the “autonomy paradox.” Continue reading >>
0
17 June 2014
Forum Shopping zwischen Luxemburg und Straßburg?
Wenn die EU der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention beitritt, wird dann der EuGH das letzte Wort über die Unionsrechtsordnung behalten können? Den EuGH scheint die Sorge zu plagen, dass dann eine Art "Forum Shopping" zwischen Straßburg und Luxemburg droht – doch kann er dem selbst Einhalt gebieten, indem er den mitgliedstaatlichen Gerichten ihre unionsrechtlichen Pflichten in Erinnerung ruft. Continue reading >>17 June 2014
Forum Shopping between Luxembourg and Strasbourg?
After an accession of the EU to the ECHR, will the ECJ keep the last word with regard to the EU legal order? The Luxembourg judges seem to be troubled by worries. But the ECJ itself may prevent highest national courts from “forum shopping” by calling for attention to their obligations under EU law. Continue reading >>30 September 2013
Hoffentlich keine Odyssee – Der Beitritt der EU zur EMRK
Seit dem 4. Juli 2013 liegt der Entwurf eines Übereinkommens zum Beitritt der EU zur EMRK auf dem Prüfstand des EuGH. In diesem Zusammenhang hat Daniel Thym die Frage aufgeworfen, ob ein EMRK-Beitritt der EU als „trojanisches Pferd“ in den Mauern des Unionsrechts dessen Effektivität bedrohe. Marten Breuer hat diesen Vorwurf zurückgewiesen: Von einem Danaer-Geschenk könne keine Rede sein. Diesem Ergebnis schließt sich auch Thomas Streinz an – wenn auch mit zum Teil anderer Begründung. Continue reading >>30 September 2013
Avoiding an Odyssey – The EU’s Accession to the ECHR
Since 4 July 2013 the draft agreement for the EU’s accession to the ECHR has been under scrutiny by the ECJ. In this context, Daniel Thym opened up a debate, concerning whether the EU’s accession to the ECHR might be a “Trojan Horse” within the walls of EU law endangering its primacy. Marten Breuer rejected this insinuation: There is no “Donum Danaorum”. While I share Breuer’s result wholeheartedly, my line of reasoning differs, at least partly. Continue reading >>
0